Toyota Woven City

Original stage labels are preserved. Unverified patterns are research audit entries, not deployments.

[]

# Toyota Woven City: SCD v0.2.3 Research Assessment
**Research date:** October 11, 2026; **publication:** not yet imported or published
**Entity:** operating experimental community / project-level district (not an independent municipality)
**Municipality/parent:** Susono City, Shizuoka Prefecture
**Assessment boundary:** Operating Phase 1, approximately 47,000 m². Phase 2 and future planned 2,000-person buildout excluded; do not equate current project with the City of Susono.
**Result:** Type ? / Level ? — evidence-insufficient operating development; documented-evidence Type score **0.00**, Autonomy score **0.00**.

## Evidence review and source audit
6 registered URLs. 6 examined/accepted, 0 examined/rejected, 0 not yet examined, 1 accepted independent publisher families. Derived Toyota press releases use a single publisher family; original indexed snippets are not automatically examined.

## Research finding
Woven City has been inhabited and operating since September 2025. It is not N/A for operating status. However the published 2026 achievements center on POCs, not proven material-scale independent service-domain operations; its v0.2.3 Type and Autonomy remain unknown. The reported future smart-city plans and experiment-level robotic actions are excluded from the operating city-level score.

## Quantitative calculation
The frozen eight service buckets each carry weight 0.125. Geographic coefficients P=.15, D=.35, N=.65, W=1. Each eligible deployment needs g=1, c≥.60, present operation and appropriate material service scale. S_Type = 100 Σ_d[.125 max_i(g c T/3)]. S_Autonomy = 100 Σ_d[.125 max_i(g c A/3)]. Type 2 requires Type Score≥10 and two independently verified T≥2 service domains; Autonomy C requires ≥10 and two A≥2 independent real closed-loop action-selection domains. A conventional sensor-triggered fixed controller is not A2.

|Domain|Type winner|T|Coverage|g|Type contribution|Autonomy winner|A|Autonomy contribution|
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---|---:|---:|
|MOB|—|?|—|0|0.0000|—|?|0.0000|
|ENG|—|?|—|0|0.0000|—|?|0.0000|
|WAT|—|?|—|0|0.0000|—|?|0.0000|
|BLD|—|?|—|0|0.0000|—|?|0.0000|
|SAF|—|?|—|0|0.0000|—|?|0.0000|
|ENV|—|?|—|0|0.0000|—|?|0.0000|
|GOV|—|?|—|0|0.0000|—|?|0.0000|
|HLT|—|?|—|0|0.0000|—|?|0.0000|

**Raw result**: Type 0.00; Autonomy 0.00. **Gated label:** ?? (where ? means insufficient evidence, not Type 0 / Level A).

## Technology inventory, status, inclusion and exclusions
### TECH-001: Phase 1 connected mobility test environment and integrated safety observation
*Primary domain MOB; T=2, A=1, c=.15, g=0; P, POC / active experiments.*
- Coverage: A small bounded test course involving approximately 160 participants, no separately documented public mobility service network.
- Decision authority: Toyota researchers analyze real-world scenes and collect experimental feedback; no sustained public transit authority verified.
- Exclusion/qualification: g=0: pilot/test facility rather than a materially served operational district mobility service.
- Sources: SRC-001;SRC-002;SRC-004
### TECH-002: Integrated ANZEN System computer-vision safety test
*Primary domain SAF; T=2, A=1, c=.15, g=0; P, POC active in 2026.*
- Coverage: System currently tested in Woven City, expansion testing planned beyond development boundary.
- Decision authority: AI recognizes hazards and can recommend/flag to development engineers.
- Exclusion/qualification: g=0: no documented district-wide production deployment or verified responder actions.
- Sources: SRC-001;SRC-005
### TECH-003: Household robotics trial in 11 homes
*Primary domain BLD; T=2, A=2, c=.15, g=0; P, pilot in 11 households.*
- Coverage: 11 of about 80 participant households (not 11 of district-wide dwellings), >1,000 experimental tasks.
- Decision authority: Robot locally selects household tasks/motions in trial conditions; residents/engineers remain responsible.
- Exclusion/qualification: g=0: cannot raise whole development rating, nor qualify Level C citywide.
- Sources: SRC-001
### TECH-004: AI Vision Engine in in-city POCs
*Primary domain GOV; T=2, A=1, c=.15, g=0; P, POC only.*
- Coverage: Used in ANZEN and cafe behavior experiments only; version 2.0 not yet released.
- Decision authority: Vision-language analysis supports project researchers and vendors, not proven municipal functions.
- Exclusion/qualification: g=0: not a full operating administrative AI platform.
- Sources: SRC-001
### TECH-005: Phase 1 inhabited buildings and utilities
*Primary domain ENG; T=1, A=0, c=.35, g=0; D, operating buildings; instrumentation details unverified.*
- Coverage: Phase 1 is occupied; precise electric meter footprint, connected control and active utility scope not documented as operating service.
- Decision authority: Building services controlled under operator governance; smart grid optimization not demonstrated.
- Exclusion/qualification: g=0 pending confirmed instrumented utility network spanning operating district.
- Sources: SRC-002;SRC-003
### TECH-006: Future Phase 2 and city-wide autonomous optimization design
*Primary domain GOV; T=3, A=3, c=.15, g=0; P, planned not operating.*
- Coverage: Phase 2 construction began September 2026, completion projected November 2028.
- Decision authority: Conceptual multi-domain optimization not deployed.
- Exclusion/qualification: g=0: no attained Type 3 or Level D.
- Sources: SRC-001

## Autonomy reasoning
No two independently proven operating higher-autonomy service domains. In particular, pilot household robots, algorithmic chatbots, scheduled incineration control, automatic meter reading and 2026 Vienna traffic sensors do not establish the Level C closed-loop action-choice gate.

## Sensitivity and why the next level is unproved
All verified advanced systems are expressly described as proof-of-concept research with limited household or facility footprints. Evidence permits an operating-community designation, but not two materially operating service domains meeting g=1. A zero lower-bound score is NOT Type 0/A. Upgrade requires operator evidence that named multi-area services are in production, including actual coverage and independent action. This case must not be ranked as a fully autonomous city.

## Source register
- SRC-001 [First year of real-world testing and community growth](https://woven.toyota/en/news/20260925) — Woven by Toyota, 2026-09-25, examined_accepted. Primary current report; about 160 participants across 80 households; approximately 30 POCs, 11 robot households; Phase 2 newly begun.
- SRC-002 [Woven City official launch September 2025](https://global.toyota/en/newsroom/corporate/43347785.html) — Toyota Motor Corporation, 2025-09-25, examined_accepted. Phase 1 began functioning as residential real-world test course, not operating citywide AI services.
- SRC-003 [Phase 1 completed and targeted residents](https://woven.toyota/en/news/20250107-01/) — Woven by Toyota, 2025-01-07, examined_accepted. 47-50k m² footprint, 300-360 phase-one capacity; forward-looking project baseline.
- SRC-004 [Woven City operational project activities June 2026](https://media.toyota.co.uk/toyota-woven-city-a-living-test-course-for-future-mobility/) — Toyota UK Media Site, 2026-06-25, examined_accepted. 100 participants in April, POCs underway; repost same publisher family Toyota, not independent corroboration.
- SRC-005 [2026 Woven City first-year press release](https://media.toyota.co.uk/toyota-woven-city-marks-first-year-of-real-world-testing-and-community-growth/) — Toyota UK Media Site, 2026-10-07, examined_accepted. Derivative of Woven by Toyota release, no independent publisher corroboration.
- SRC-006 [Toyota annual report Woven City operations](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1094517/000119312526264811/d101983d20f.htm) — U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / Toyota, 2026-07, examined_accepted. Primary regulatory filed statement of operation and experimental aim; shares Toyota source family for underlying facts.

## Editorial/production note
This report records evidence-supported provisional scenario assumptions and distinguishes non-operating or locally limited technology. The Sites production classification engine must re-check source acceptance and all gates and must not force a higher class. Only publish a validated classification with uncertainty notes; preserve historical research.